You don't have to visit a butcher's shop - you CAN get tripe online

Please read and digest the following two points carefully:

The inventor of the secular koranism cult, Claire Khaw, claims: "I am a psychologist, legally-qualified moralist, scientist, philosopher, therapist and religious expert, probably the most theologically knowledgable in the West if not the world"
What is your impression of the above statement in the context of the following post of hers on 16th January 2024?

She posted this a few years ago:

For starters, you will see that her avatar, almost a month old at the time of this post, is the Yiddisha (of Polish origin and nothing to do with Hebrew) word for a "female gentile" or "woman of non-Jewish" origin.

The word is now only really used somewhat pejoratively and predominantly in the USA, where it has entered the general language as a term for a "loose woman", "prostitute" or "gangster's moll". Very old-fashioned, ultra-religious (Hassidic) Jews of Eastern European origin still use it to describe a gentile woman.

Claire Khaw made this statement.

In other words, if you don't understand her manic and incomprehensible and frankly, ridiculous witterings above, you have a mental disorder. And then this:

And there's also this:

And then two rather revealing statements that really are a self-examination by this rather mad woman:

You make up your own mind. Don't let me influence you.

Comments

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe...

If Claire Khaw was a pop act, after the past 15 years at it, she'd still be a no-hit wonder

If you like an hour debating with an unplugged, empty vending machine about the return of your money, then debate with Claire Khaw! You'll probably at least get somewhere! With the unplugged vending machine that is. As I said in my first blog, secular koranism is the equivalent of a social cure for which there is no disease. It is like some bright spark in a health authority saying "Hey, as we're throwing away far too many crutches, let's reintroduce polio". From “ Secular Koranism? Refuting the Novel Call Coined by the Woman, Claire Khaw ” (a detailed review paper by the Islamic academic Wm. Halim Breiannis, reviewing her appalling book that she claims is a " legal system [of happy-clappy Sharia no less] for the world " On Page 4, second paragraph, beginning line four of Wm. Halim's appraisal, and according to Claire Khaw herself: “I was born in Malaysia… …I came to England when I was 15 as a student. …I did manage to pass my Bar Exams and gra...

To recap and summarise all about secular koranism and how truly nonsensical it all is - this will save you reading all blogs (altough I hope you do)

One does have to question the motives and thought processes of Claire Khaw. She may be clever (devious) , but certinly demonstrates time and time again that she is not very bright and certainly is most definitely lacking any intelligence. Her claims about the CIA controlling the world's media , together with the other conspiracy theories/theorists she supports and defends, and the incredibly idiotic statement that "Hamas only want Jews in Israel to live under Sharia" are particularly good examples. These two alone that she will not back down from, despite being offered solid, empirical proof to the contrary, completely defy any form of belief. This is more so given Clair Khaw is a person claiming to have an honours law degree (as a barrister) from Kingston University . "Yes m'Lud. I offer no proof whatsoever, but I state categorically that my client is innocent. Therefore you must free him". " The Law of Assumption states that if you believe already...

Radicalised Imam

Search This Blog