You don't have to visit a butcher's shop - you CAN get tripe online

Please read and digest the following two points carefully:

The inventor of the secular koranism cult, Claire Khaw, claims: "I am a psychologist, legally-qualified moralist, scientist, philosopher, therapist and religious expert, probably the most theologically knowledgable in the West if not the world"
What is your impression of the above statement in the context of the following post of hers on 16th January 2024?

She posted this a few years ago:

For starters, you will see that her avatar, almost a month old at the time of this post, is the Yiddisha (of Polish origin and nothing to do with Hebrew) word for a "female gentile" or "woman of non-Jewish" origin.

The word is now only really used somewhat pejoratively and predominantly in the USA, where it has entered the general language as a term for a "loose woman", "prostitute" or "gangster's moll". Very old-fashioned, ultra-religious (Hassidic) Jews of Eastern European origin still use it to describe a gentile woman.

Claire Khaw made this statement.

In other words, if you don't understand her manic and incomprehensible and frankly, ridiculous witterings above, you have a mental disorder. And then this:

And there's also this:

And then two rather revealing statements that really are a self-examination by this rather mad woman:

You make up your own mind. Don't let me influence you.

Comments

What sort of "thing" at all is this secular koranism nonsense?

DISCLAIMER: I am deeply indebted to the "fully-qualified", "experienced", "professorial academics" and a "working legal eagle" all of whom, in their professional capacities (apologies, no names for obvious reasons) have given up their time to concur fully with my observances based solely on the facts and evidence (all obtained through Claire Khaw's own postings) that I have gathered. It has not been my intention in any way to do so, but there is nothing libelous or defamatory within this series of exposé blogs. It is all simply fully evidence-based, with reasonable conclusions drawn on what I have observed, to demonstrate the utter, blatant, disingenuousness of secular koranism and its inventor. To paraphrase Thomas Edison "This is something already in existence, just vapidly repurposed as something else, but as a something else no one needs or wants, that doesn't, and will never, work and is otherwise a creative act of misa...

Why does Claire Khaw idolise the terrorists Hamas with her sheer fiction and yet has NEVER condemned them?

Before starting this, I remind you that Claire Khaw professes to be, " A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgeable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". All the evidence presented below is either from her own timeline/offensive antisemitic blog, or from freely available authoritative (unlike Claire Khaw who only uses Wikipedia) sources. It is worth noting the words legally-qualified moralist above in the context that since the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7th October (it is now 28 Nov - 7 WEEKS since) NOT ONCE has Claire Khaw called out the atrocity, admitted that Hamas are terrorists or offered/shown the slightest sympathy for the 1,400 Israeli brutally murdered, or acknowledge that the Hamas Charter, which is accessible everywhere on the Internet, is acknowledged worldwide as calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. And she had the bare-faced nerve to post this ...

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe...

Radicalised Imam

Search This Blog