What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is.

So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passed away in 2000, but she was loved and cared for by her parents and brother all her life!

And this wonderful (= disgusting) antsemitic, blood-libel conspiracy theory posted by him on 29 Nov 23 (I wasted my time asking him for proof. As per usual, none was forthcoming):

As if the above isn't highly offensive enough, Claire Khaw had the nerve to post this lie on 3rd November 2023

That Vincent Bruno is a deeply disturbed, antisemitic conspiracy theorist is clear from his postings on Clair Khaw's timeline. Yet she welcomes him several times a week with open arms, without criticism or censure. In fact, she encourages him. And she acknowledged he has "mental issues". Whether he is being just racist and bigoted, or whether it is his parents' fault is not clear from this posting. Yet he is quick to claim that Jehovahs Witnesses are misogynistic when it is abundantly clear that Clair Khaw is too.

Claire sees nothing wrong with the Taliban preventing girls from attending school after 11 years of age, or from preventing young women from working. This is clear from the fact that nowhere on her timeline does she condemn this antisocial practice. And neither does she speak up for the 98% of females who are reckoned to have undergone female genital mutilation in Muslim Somalia. Or the Iranian young women murdered for simply not covering their hair.

Below is another of Bruno's, unproven conspiracy theories Claire Khaw (remember, the self-declared non-antisemite) sees no problem with:

 

 

Presumably Bruno thinks the above graduates will attack twin towers in New York, London Underground Stations, Israeli Athletes, Israeli families on a kibbutz or people enjoying a concert in Manchester with their highly dangerous graduation certificates.

This is the solitary proof for his accusations. Someone's blog! Not ANY someone. Just his own!

While I have heard of the "Jewish Registers of Birth, Marriage and Death/Burial", I've never heard of the "Jewish registrar". And the ridiculous secular koranism is just a cult with zero provenance or standing, so nothing can be "struck off" under it. As for "lesson hatred" - I have no idea what that means; unless he is discussing the lessons in hatred he provides others via Claire Khaw. He is plainly illiterate and ignorant. "That's against the law" he screams. No it ain't mate. If anything, you are, as change.org seems to concur when he was trying to raise a petition and money to have Noahide banned.

This is another example of Bruno's "literacy" and grasp of human history (Not!) Again, promoted by Claire Khaw.

One revelation is, that while Claire Khaw unreservedly repeats "she is not antisemitic" and continually asks "who of my friends are antisemitic" and "where have I posted things that are antisemitic" (astute readers will by now have realised that Bruno is both a raging antisemite, is a friend of Claire Khaw, and she has shard his antisemitic conspiracy theory posts on numerous occasions!), she stated the following, on the 15th November 2023:

She had posted this on the 6th Nov 2023:

  

And the to cap it all, Claire Khaw had the bear-faced cheek to ask this (she is not a qualified therapist of any description) on 17 Nov 23 

Er, yes, of course I am. It's patently obvious, unless you are being honest and calling yourself a liar!

Do have a look at this blog from the antisemitic conspiracy theorist himself folks. Every point he raises is untrue (each claim of his I have already disproven with proof from her own timeline througout this series of blogs) because dear Vincent has nil proof himself otherwise. As per usual. 

It's a shame he can't think for himself. But the that is why cult leaders target people like him. Look at Jim Jones, the Branch Dividians or Charles Manson. All followed by gullible simpletons. I'm sure he does have some good qualities, but they certsinly don't manifest themselves on Facebook or in his ridiculous, bigoted blogs.

So, what Claire Khaw is saying is that:

1. She is happy to interact regularly and post material on her timeline from someone whom she claims (using her "professional", albeit, totally unqualified expertise) has "mental problems", where the material he posts and she subsequently reposts with zero comment or warning could very probably be a lie or proven false? And she claims the moral high ground?
2. Reposting material from Vincent Bruno is like asking Fred West to write a Trustpilot for gravediggers or asking her friends in Hamas to cater for a Bar Mitzvah!

I have proven Bruno's postings to be false and a lie for months, yet she keeps on reposting them! I find Claire Khaw's justifications, sheer hypocrisy and obvious confusion, well, it's all just rather confusing.