Skip to main content

For someone who claims to be Agnostic and promoting a supposedly secular cult, things look rather God-like

Lo and behold, the first signs of total self-confusion and being at odds with herself. Claire Khaw hits us straight away with her self-confusion via a very religion-orientated warning to in essence tell us all you have to have a religion. Yet she claims to be agnostic, albeit very much with "Muslim characteristics", as she might say herself. So straight away, we have a vegan telling us all to eat meat.

The requirement for God and religion pops up as a persistent theme on Claire Khaw's blogs and her offensive RadicalisedRabbi blog. This is both completely disingenuous and thoroughly confusing.

Whoa, hold the bus. The Agnostic and secular-pushing Claire Khaw is now telling us we need an official religion. Let's pause and grab a few Oxford English Dictionary definitions before going any further:

 
 
So, what we have in Claire Khaw is a person who believes nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God pushing a cult she claims is not connected with religious or spiritual matters but which has as its operating manual the Islamic sacred book believed to be the word of God while at the same time she telling everyone we need to have a religion and believe in God or we're all rotten and done for.
If that is not the most confusing thing you've read and is nothing but totally at odds with itself, then I don't know what the definition of "confusion" is!
 
 
Now we have her here thanking the good Lord for Telegram. That is, when she's not thanking other, or as the sceptic might say, her god
 
 
Such blatant proselytising and hypocrisy. For those not in the know, Telegram (without being accusatory) is widely recognised as the messaging app of choice for degenerates, right-wing extremists, Nazis and conspiracy theorists and their groups (that have been kicked off Facebook, Instagram and YouTube), con-merchants and scammers, COVID-19 deniers, misogynists (remember, Claire Khaw adores Andrew Tate), anti-Semites, Holocaust denial, Rothschild conspiracists and QAnon followers. 
It is most popular in countries like Iran, Uzbekistan, and Russia. German child protection organisation Jugendschutz analysed 206 pieces of content considered illegal under German law and found Telegram failed to remove 89 percent of the reported content. 
So it is perhaps no wonder that Clair Khaw thanks her god (the one that as an Agnostic and secular, she could be accused of being rather hypocritical to believe in) for it. In fact, she makes this wonderful observation, simply becase I, like so many others, think her secular koranism is total nonsense::
She has published many other gems that make her Agnosticism and secularism claim lack any form of credibility whatsoever:
And in a subtle antsemitic post blog she is involved with, trying to infer Jews hate Chairtianity. Such devisive nonsense.

 
 
 
 
 
 
(Doesn't take her pal Green Day (the American Idiot) long to turn up to chat about things he is clueless about)
 
And yet more icing on the cake from the Agnostic secularist

She's at it yet again on 23rd Nov 23:

How something as divisive as this has a place on Facebook is beyond comprehension. I have Muslim friends who find this deeply offensive.

And these gems posted the same day:

This to me is not very Agnostic or secular. Unless I am mistaken. So, you decide for yourself. Is Claire Khaw the Agnostic secularist she makes herself out to be? 

Based on proof from her own timeline as above, I know what I think. Words like "have your cake" and "eat it" come to mind. As does "despicable, untrustworthy hypocrite" and "scam". I can't quite put my finger on why these words come to mind. Maybe someone out there can explain.
Claire Khah not only can't, but wont. I've asked her numerous times.

And the crowning glory of confusion. Can someone explain how something can be secular if it's Islamic? Isn't Islam a major world religion? Claire Khaw doesn't seem to know! And she's invented this secular koranism nonsense, claiming she is not proseletysing for Islam.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe...
1 comment
Read more

New street-gutter low reached by the inventor of the "secular koranism" cult

I'd like you to hold the underlined statements in the image below in your mind for a few paragraphs. It's the introduction to one of the most dystopian pseudo religious books on Amazon, described by a leading independent Islamic scholar in essence as being " just over 100 pages of inaccurate, pure drivel, in a larger than necessary font, that does nothing if demonstrate the writer's total lack of understanding of Islam and the Quran ". The full excellently researched white paper can be found here . I'd like to state from the outset that some people have said I am being somewhat harsh on Claire Khaw throughout these exposé blogs. Well I can assure you that everything contained within these blogs refuting secular koranism, while I have added commentary of my own, is 100% evidence-based on Claire Khaw's very own output on social media and elsewhere.  Yes, I have indeed been harsh, because the evidence points clearly to Claire Khaw being an inveterate lia...
Post a Comment
Read more

"I am not antisemitic, who of my friends are antisemites/Jewhaters? You can't be jailed for being antisemitic!"

Yes, she is not antsemitic, yet sees nothing wrong with posting this on 21 December '23, giving publicity to the piece of dog excrement that is the highly-jailable neo-Nazi Nick Griffin. What normal person claiming not to be antisemitic even pays the slightest attention to this vile human being? She should be dismissing him, not publicising him. And she does this all the time, having the absolute bare-faced cheek to ask this yet again (having asked it many times before and been offered proof on every occasion) on 27 Dec '23 Claire Khaw is out on her own here. As she says herself below: "I don't think" . And that is the basic problem. Claire Khaw tends not to think, apart from the odd thought or 30 that she is always right and everyone else is wrong. She will never admit to being wrong or that there are people out there who are far better and far more qualified than she is as the expert she dishonestly claims to be. She doesn't care about the feelings of othe...
Post a Comment
Read more