Skip to main content

For someone who claims to be Agnostic and promoting a supposedly secular cult, things look rather God-like

Lo and behold, the first signs of total self-confusion and being at odds with herself. Claire Khaw hits us straight away with her self-confusion via a very religion-orientated warning to in essence tell us all you have to have a religion. Yet she claims to be agnostic, albeit very much with "Muslim characteristics", as she might say herself. So straight away, we have a vegan telling us all to eat meat.

The requirement for God and religion pops up as a persistent theme on Claire Khaw's blogs and her offensive RadicalisedRabbi blog. This is both completely disingenuous and thoroughly confusing.

Whoa, hold the bus. The Agnostic and secular-pushing Claire Khaw is now telling us we need an official religion. Let's pause and grab a few Oxford English Dictionary definitions before going any further:

 
 
So, what we have in Claire Khaw is a person who believes nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God pushing a cult she claims is not connected with religious or spiritual matters but which has as its operating manual the Islamic sacred book believed to be the word of God while at the same time she telling everyone we need to have a religion and believe in God or we're all rotten and done for.
If that is not the most confusing thing you've read and is nothing but totally at odds with itself, then I don't know what the definition of "confusion" is!
 
 
Now we have her here thanking the good Lord for Telegram. That is, when she's not thanking other, or as the sceptic might say, her god
 
 
Such blatant proselytising and hypocrisy. For those not in the know, Telegram (without being accusatory) is widely recognised as the messaging app of choice for degenerates, right-wing extremists, Nazis and conspiracy theorists and their groups (that have been kicked off Facebook, Instagram and YouTube), con-merchants and scammers, COVID-19 deniers, misogynists (remember, Claire Khaw adores Andrew Tate), anti-Semites, Holocaust denial, Rothschild conspiracists and QAnon followers. 
It is most popular in countries like Iran, Uzbekistan, and Russia. German child protection organisation Jugendschutz analysed 206 pieces of content considered illegal under German law and found Telegram failed to remove 89 percent of the reported content. 
So it is perhaps no wonder that Clair Khaw thanks her god (the one that as an Agnostic and secular, she could be accused of being rather hypocritical to believe in) for it. In fact, she makes this wonderful observation, simply becase I, like so many others, think her secular koranism is total nonsense::
She has published many other gems that make her Agnosticism and secularism claim lack any form of credibility whatsoever:
And in a subtle antsemitic post blog she is involved with, trying to infer Jews hate Chairtianity. Such devisive nonsense.

 
 
 
 
 
 
(Doesn't take her pal Green Day (the American Idiot) long to turn up to chat about things he is clueless about)
 
And yet more icing on the cake from the Agnostic secularist

She's at it yet again on 23rd Nov 23:

How something as divisive as this has a place on Facebook is beyond comprehension. I have Muslim friends who find this deeply offensive.

And these gems posted the same day:

This to me is not very Agnostic or secular. Unless I am mistaken. So, you decide for yourself. Is Claire Khaw the Agnostic secularist she makes herself out to be? 

Based on proof from her own timeline as above, I know what I think. Words like "have your cake" and "eat it" come to mind. As does "despicable, untrustworthy hypocrite" and "scam". I can't quite put my finger on why these words come to mind. Maybe someone out there can explain.
Claire Khah not only can't, but wont. I've asked her numerous times.

And the crowning glory of confusion. Can someone explain how something can be secular if it's Islamic? Isn't Islam a major world religion? Claire Khaw doesn't seem to know! And she's invented this secular koranism nonsense, claiming she is not proseletysing for Islam.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why does Claire Khaw idolise the terrorists Hamas with her sheer fiction and yet has NEVER condemned them?

Before starting this, I remind you that Claire Khaw professes to be, " A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". All the evidence presented below is either from her own timeline/offensive antisemitic blog, or from freely available authoritative (unlike Claire Khaw who only uses Wikipedia) sources. It is worth noting the words  legally-qualified moralist above in the context that since the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7th October (it is now 28 Nov - 7 WEEKS since) NOT ONCE has Claire Khaw called out the atrocity, admitted that Hamas are terrorists or offered/shown the slightest sympathy for the 1,400 Israeli brutally murdered, or acknowledge that the Hamas Charter, which is accessible everywhere on the Internet, is acknowledged worldwide as calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. And she had the bare-faced nerve to post this o
4 comments
Read more

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe
1 comment
Read more

What sort of "thing" at all is this secular koranism nonsense?

DISCLAIMER: I am deeply indebted to the "fully-qualified", "experienced", "professorial adademics" and a "working legal eagle" all of whom, in their professional capacities (apologies, no names for obvious reasons) have given up their time to concur fully with my observances based solely on the facts and evidence (all obtained through Claire Khaw's own postings) that I have gathered. It has not been my intention in any way to do so, but there is nothing libelous or defamatory within this series of exposé blogs. It is all simply fully evidence-based, with reasonable conclusions drawn on what I have observed, to demonstrate the utter, blatant, disingenuousness of secular koranism and its inventor. To paraphrase Thomas Edison   "This is something already in existence, just vapidly repurposed as something else, but as a something else no one needs or wants, that doesn't, and will never, work and is otherwise a creative act of misa
1 comment
Read more