You can't beat a good conspiracy theory/lie/nonsense when those you support tend to be deranged too

I can only assume Claire Khaw's lack of knowledge about the truth and current affairs is driven by her addiction, 24/7, to Facebook (that is, when she's not trolling the internet for deviants to support her nonsense, or having conversations for her own puerile YouTube videos and blogs). 

She is, to paraphrase Rod Liddle from The Sunday Times on 26 Nov 23 [that is, the newspaper first published 202 years ago, at the time of writing this blog, on 18 February 1821 (originally as The New Observer) and taken over by Rupert Murdoch's News International in 1981, as opposed to Claire Khaw's Sunday Times that is owned by the CIA] an example of a modern, internet-addicted person whose IQ is shrinking.

"People's IQ's are declining due to their failure to assimilate knowledge, history and real news by languishing on the internet 24/7 and not paying any attention to real things going on around them. They are becoming more ignorant thought their own endeavours"

 

Claire Khaw adores Andrew Tate, claiming "like herself he is also a psychologist as well as a moral and political philosopher". This would be amusing if it wasn't such a deranged and extremely antisocial concept.

One of her nefarious past activities. Gaddafi scam

Claire Khaw, the self-proclaimed "psychologist, legally-qualified moralist, therapist, scientist, philosopher and religious expert ('probably the most theologically knowledgable in the west if not the world' she declares)" loves a good conspiracy theory, a bit of fake news and can be quite paranoid with it. To many, it's simply called "Blame Culture".
 

Down to business. Here is one of her classics. She has a buddy boy Vincent Bruno who is a real party pooper. One of many (of her few associates after 15 years) with a negative IQ. The perfect person to be a UNHRA ambassador. Here is a separate blog devoted to him Vincent Bruno but to give you a flavour of his humanist outpourings, here are a couple of his wonderful postings/conspiracy theories.

The red surrounded box is what Hindutva actually is - Indian Hindu Nationalism - and absolutely nothing to do with Zionism. It's the equivalent of claiming the IRA and the deeply antisemitic Sinn Fein are Zionists.

The "proof" provided? Not from Claire Khaw who reposted the original above without checking. Eventually it came from Bruno. He's nicknamed "Green Day" after their hit song "American Idiot" No idea why!

She reposts almost on a daily basis blogs from Paul Craig Roberts, an anti-Semitic syn­di­cated colum­nist and identified conspiracy theorist, whose most notorious arti­cle on his per­sonal web­site claim­ing that there are sus­pi­cions “that the French shoot­ings were a false flag oper­a­tion.” gained worldwide public ridicule. Roberts iden­ti­fied sev­eral rea­sons for this, includ­ing “to sti­fle the grow­ing Euro­pean sym­pa­thy for the Pales­tini­ans and to realign Europe with Israel.” Paul Craig Roberts the conspiracy theorist

Another of the grinning Cheshire cat's (and sadly Clint Eastwood lookalike's) great pronouncements:

Moving on. I asked Claire Khaw for proof of this.

And to prove her selective memory, she asked this yet AGAIN on 15th November 23

And now, on 19th Nov 23, she is accusing the most virulently independent publication in the UK of being "under control" of some higher force. As if Ian Hislop, the editor of "Private Eye" magazine would accede to someone telling him what he can or can't publish! Many have tried to, and failed miserably.

 

Along with this about Private Eye on the same day:

Her obsession with the CIA controlling the world's media seem to me to imply she has something to hide. I wonder if it has anything to do with her extremely inglorious past?

I'm not too sure how many times she expects me to answer, or how long it will take to see some actual, verifiable proof of her ridiculous, infantile CIA claim. After asking a record 16 times (you would think someone who makes any sort of claim in public about anything would have their proof to hand!), she provided this limp-wristed "proof" from some idiot on the social platform noted for being that respected  bastion of total honesty and integrity (not), Twitter:

 

She is completely paranoid about the CIA taking an interest in her. I did have a British journalist initially interested in interviewing her, but the journalist changed her mind for several very relevant reasons.

1. She didn't want to afford Claire Khaw the oxygen of publicity she craves for her outlandish cult
2. She was annoyed that Claire Khaw thought the newspaper she has worked for past years is controlled by the CIA
3. Having inspected Clair Khaw's Facebook and blog, she concluded things about her that are not reproducible here
4. She, like any sentient human being, felt rightly this below was one of the most abhorrent postings she has seen on Facebook in a long time, especially coming from someone claiming to be a legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world".

But lo and behold, on 05 Dec 23, with still no proof forthcoming, she's at it again! You could not make this up. In was follwing a resopnse where I posed a reasonable question given her disblief in Western media. Together with her persitant paranoia that Western media is owned by the CIA and a major British newspaper would need CIA clearance to do an article on a fantasising, unemployed nobody such as herself, who has been plugging a cartload of self-indulgent horsesh*t for the p[ast 15 years to patently IQ-challenged people.

 

 

Regarding the CIA, she seems to think she is top dog as a target for them. Personally, being as she is an irrelevancy, I can't see them wasting their time on her. It might otherwise be useful form the rest of us if they did.

Meanwhile, the CIA have far more important fish to fry than an internet crank pushing a ridiculous cult. Paranoia par excellence.

 

 

And again, having asked for proof of her ridiculous "CIA run the world media" conspiracy theory so many times that I have forgotten, the woman posts this on 25th Nov 23:

Surely, if you make repeated claims, it is simple to prove them! Especially if you are "legally-qualified" ("Sorry m'Lud, I said my client is innocent, so I have no need to prove it to you, so just let him go free")

And on 3rd November 2023, to once again confirm her sheer paranoia, these two absolute gems:

 

Her book on her secular koranism cult, has, by the way, already been trashed by two Islamic scholars, here's one of them from "A Comprehensive Book Review of Claire Khaw’s Monumental Work and Magnum Opus (😂), “Secular Koranism” by Wm. Halim Breiannis: (further details here: WTF is secular koranism?)
"This idea (secular koranism) has met opposition wherever it has been presented. Audience after audience on so many platforms of social media have informed her of their rejection and yet, she has been unfazed. Over the last year, I myself have engaged with her repeatedly. I have offered constructive criticism, given positive feedback, refuted her idea and offered better and more viable counter proposals. This, of course, was not met well and her vitriol was spewed forth like venom on many an occasion."

This was a classic; no proof from Claire Khaw of course:

The Guardian is based at 61 Broadway (the Adams Express Building), New York. Yes, a solicitors' practice, Dorr, Hand, Whittaker & Watson who were involved on one occasion with a CIA property safety certificate in connection with their Langley HQ, were originally based in Wall Street and then at 61 Broadway. Broad Street is the only connection the CIA have with that building. The Metrolpolitan Life Insurance Company and RXR Realty have owned the building. It is currently owned by the Aareal Bank. CIA field offices are under state secret, but since it was built in 1913, the Adams Express Building has housed only commercial tenants. However, it is not possible for the average Joe Soap to establish the locations of field offices of the CIA.

Meanwhile, more news for the Jews of the world

  

This was certainly news to me and my Jewish friends. The only people we know of who murder for blasphemy are the Pakistanis. And I think it's a well-known fact that residents of Pakistan are not Jewish. Here's just one example: Blasphemy in Pakistan

She wants America to enshrine her nonsensical "secular koranism" cult into the American Constitution, yet is far from complimentary about the USA. 

Presumably, she says this, thinking that if it is a "global empire", having her secular koranism nonsense as part of their Constitution (some hope!) they will spread it for her. Utter, infantile delusion. Oh, and then she changes tack when replying to someone else:

 

Presumably, then, but also being an internet global empire, a mountain global empire and an air global empire, she has all areas covered. Just the moon and mars to go. No doubt she'll ask either Captains Kirk or Picard to handle that:

"Clair Khaw, I don't believe my ears!"

"Spock, I don't believe your ears either"

Some other conspiracy theories (or straightforward lies as they are often termed) supported by an appearance unchallenged on Clair Khaw's timeline:

 

And another of her daft acolytes who invents his own history and whom Claire Khaw is happy to host on her Facebook page:

And of course, before I finish, we must's forget that Jordan Peterson is another hero of Claire Khaw, and yet another out and out misognyst:

 

Claire Khaw certainly knows how to assemble many of the world's acknowledged deviants and lunatics in one place - on her timeline!

 

Most infuriating of all, which Claire Khaw seems to be totally blind to, is that, if you make any form of outlandish claim in public, at least have the morals and human decency to provide proof. After all,  advertising is controlled by law in that it must be truthful. And Claire Khaw's 24/7 use of Facebook is as her personal, free advertising agency.