Skip to main content

Claire Khaw a Nazi? That's a bit of a strong accusation isn't it?

  

Well, as they used to say on TV's "Little Britain" series, "Yes, but no, but yes, but no.....", although actually, in this case, it's not just an accusation. Especially when all the signs are there for all to see.

There is ample evidence that Clair Khaw was most certainly very involved with the racist BNP (British National Party). And it is very unusual for a neo-Nazi to suddenly dispense with their twisted beliefs. The same applies to both far-Right and far-Left supporters. They become so entrenched in their often deluded and dangerous beliefs that they are the only ones who believe them, and everyone else is wrong. The followers of Jeremy Corbyn in ther UK proved that.

I would say that Claire Khaw is probably quite clever. Deviously so, when one reads her timeline posts on Facebook and her demented personal blogs. She demonstrates the signs of a true cult leader. 

However, despite how clever she may or may not be, she undoubtedly is not at all intelligent. 

This is obvious from:

  • her persistent conspiracy theorising and the posting of conspiracy theories from others
  • her large scale economy with the truth
  • her persistent use of totally unqualified sources (usually only Wikipedia or from some pissant who has posted on YouTube or their own blog) to attempt to prove her claims,
  • her lack of any willingness to either admit she is wrong or to ever apologise for when she is wrong
  • her utter and complete narcissism
  • her total contempt for the feeling of others
  • her megalomania regarding her utterly ridiculous secular koranism cult
  • her total failure to accept there can be anyone more qualified than herself in many and several disciplines that she claims to have expertise in (but nil qualifications in or experience with!)
  • her continual engagement and interaction with, and defence of some of the greatest deviants on the planet
  • her repetitive questions on the same subjects over and over again, despite them all having been addressed earlier elsewhere on her timeline (the internet generation call this persistent questioning "FAQing", and Claire Khaw's questions are definitely "FAQing repetitive and irritating").

What she says of herself: "I am a legally-qualified (honours degree, non-practising barrister - it is fast becoming the case where I do not believe this for one moment), moralist, a psychologist, a social and political scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner and therapist (She has also now revealed herself on 15th Nov 2023 to be a therapist (ironically, she is also a very dogged supporter of "the-rapist" (alleged, but nevertheless arrested for it) Andrew Tate.", all on top of already being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world.". 

Phew! If her CV of magnificent achievements and world-class "qualifications" gets any longer, she'll have zero time to spend on the current 24/7 she does, split as it is between Facebook, making pointless YouTube videos and her distasteful blogs!

My, is there no end to her talents? Or rather, is there no talent to her end?

Yet with all the above, she is absolutely and irrevocably clueless about Zionism (she says, for example, stated that the Quran, Allah and her friends Hamas, are Zionist, very deluded and antisemitic comments to make); she has very little, if any, grasp of Judaism, Christianity or Hinduism, and despite it being written in their own charter and highly publicised, she vehemently continues to disagree that the ultimate aim of Hamas is the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. It is impossible to get through to her on the latter point, which gives a very solid indication of the type of person she actually is.

So, how can I claim she might be a Nazi? There are many and several indications, especially from her chequered past. For example, she lauds David Irving, the jailed conspiracy theorist and Holocaust denier, having been photographed in his presence no less than twice. (She states David Irving "is entitled to his opinion" - WHAT? his "opinion" - no, he is NOT entitled to his opinion when it is plainly 100% Holocaust denial and he is recognised worldwide as being a professional antisemite!)

The following images are from a third-party blog. As far as I am aware, they are most certainly genuine.

Claire Khaw photographed with the charming, antisemitic conspiracy theorist and Holocaust denier David Irving who she feels should not have been jailed (personally, I and many millions are rather sorry they didn't throw away the key) in Austria for his Holocaust denial.

 

Presumably nothing to do with neo-Nazism

And neither is this (just demonstrating a different armament)

A quick change into a happy Hitler t-shirt, apparently something "that might infuriate the Nazis" or people who "revere Hitler" (er, they are current neo-Nazis, the only specimens on earth who do) - I would have thought those who revere Hitler are not, like Claire Khaw, "moral". Which she is not.

A quick plug for the Roman Seig Heil 

I'm not too sure Muslims appreciate being taught happy classes from Mr Hitler or being associated with him, (the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem during the Second World War excepted)!

Hitler and the Grand Mufti: What They Really Said in 1941 | Time

And presumably pride of place for Claire Khaw where, like Himmler and Hitler, she wants to rid the world of disabled children. Gas Mark 7 Claire Khaw! The above is from 2015, but seven years later, in 2023, she's still extolling the virtues (!) of post-natal infanticide for disabled children between birth and puberty. Along with her very good friend Vincent Bruno who she acknowledges is mad (many have said her rantings and ravings beg the question regarding her own stability), but whom she still engages with on a regular basis. Don't forget, she claims to be a "legally-qualified moralist".

 

As a parting shot from one of many who feels the same:

And then this trumps up on her Facebook timeline on 21 Dec 23, after all her claims of not ebing an antsemite. Publicising the utter codswallop from Jewhating, fat neo-Nazi cockroach, Nick Griffn. With a video to accompany it. I leave you to make your own judgement as to the morality and honesty of Claire Khaw and her ridiculous secular koranism.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe...

New street-gutter low reached by the inventor of the "secular koranism" cult

I'd like you to hold the underlined statements in the image below in your mind for a few paragraphs. It's the introduction to one of the most dystopian pseudo religious books on Amazon, described by a leading independent Islamic scholar in essence as being " just over 100 pages of inaccurate, pure drivel, in a larger than necessary font, that does nothing if demonstrate the writer's total lack of understanding of Islam and the Quran ". The full excellently researched white paper can be found here . I'd like to state from the outset that some people have said I am being somewhat harsh on Claire Khaw throughout these exposé blogs. Well I can assure you that everything contained within these blogs refuting secular koranism, while I have added commentary of my own, is 100% evidence-based on Claire Khaw's very own output on social media and elsewhere.  Yes, I have indeed been harsh, because the evidence points clearly to Claire Khaw being an inveterate lia...

Comparing the inventor of secular koranism to the Horizon Post Office scandal

The inventor of the secular koranism cult, Claire Khaw, and the Fujitsu Horizon Post Office scandal have so much in common! 1. Clueless, if not immoral legal people from the Post Office saying all was all fine and dandy when it most certainly was not. Claire Khaw claims to be an honours law graduate. 2. Apportioning blame to everyone else except themselves (the trait of a cult). 3. Those postmasters who were blamed, lost their lives or were jailed, had to pay back money they did not owe, were vilified by their communities, lost their businesses, their livelihoods and their homes were all ignored despite proof being in their favour that Horizon was not fit for purpose and that the sub-postmasters were all in fact 100% innocent. It is very simple to prove Claire Khaw wrong, almost excl;usively though her own postings, yet she will NEVER admit, take responsibility or apologise she is/was wrong. 4. The Post Office made sh*t up as they want along in an attempt to obfuscate the truth about H...