Skip to main content

Why does Claire Khaw idolise the terrorists Hamas with her sheer fiction and yet has NEVER condemned them?

Before starting this, I remind you that Claire Khaw professes to be, "A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". All the evidence presented below is either from her own timeline/offensive antisemitic blog, or from freely available authoritative (unlike Claire Khaw who only uses Wikipedia) sources.

It is worth noting the words legally-qualified moralist above in the context that since the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7th October (it is now 28 Nov - 7 WEEKS since) NOT ONCE has Claire Khaw called out the atrocity, admitted that Hamas are terrorists or offered/shown the slightest sympathy for the 1,400 Israeli brutally murdered, or acknowledge that the Hamas Charter, which is accessible everywhere on the Internet, is acknowledged worldwide as calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews.

And she had the bare-faced nerve to post this on 13 Nov 2023. You draw your own conclusions from reading her own content.

So this is how Hamas want Israelis to live under them, 1st Dec 23.


 You really couldn't make the above statement up, unless you are totally hard of thinking. And she "discovered" it no less! Not too sure what slurry pit she was diving in!

And added on 22 Nov 23, including a further comment by Claire Khaw and very "peaceful" comment by one of her supporters on 25 Nov 23 in response to a comment by another respondent shocked by her statements about Hamas and her lack of any condemnation of Hamas since the 7th October 23 atrocity. 

 

No, of course they don't Claire Khaw. It's to stop conspiracy theorising dolts like you and your fellow deviants from posting total fakery and idolising them!

 

Is this the type of "legally-qualified" moralist you'd like to see in charge of a "legal system"?

BUT NO, she steadfastly refuses to acknowledge the well-established and recognised fact about Hamas that, by their own admission via their published murderous charter, they seek the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews.

Instead, she has posted some of the most ridiculous theories that can be found anywhere on the internet. So whether you actually believe she either has morals, or is fit to run this moronic "legal system" she calls secular koranism, is now up to you.

These unbelievable statements posted on the 14th Nov 2023. You could not make these up. They were in response to my query as to why she does not recognise Hamas as a terrorist organisation and as someone claiming to be moral, she has not condemned the Hamas incursion into Israel to murder 1400 people and take hostages. Neither has she shown the slightest empathy for the murdered Israelis or the hostages. And she claims she is moral!

And is this an especially good, moral example for her to use to back up her unhinged and totally false claims? A good PR agency? Specialising in whitewashing terrorists no doubt.

Or perhaps I am mistaken and these are great examples of one who is "A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgable person in the West if not in the whole wide world".

And here is some more conspiracy theorising from that moronic American grinning Cheshire cat whom Claire Khaw lauds:

And another Jewhating moron, totally devoid of reality, who she lauds. This one below is about as offensive and untrue at it can be. Plainly another zombie conspiracy theorist. "Allegedly attacked first". Not too sure which planet this Neo lives on, but it sure ain't earth.

Am I being unfair and unjust? Over-critical? Or do all sentient, socially, politically and religiously aware people make such claims, and it's just that I have missed them? For one, the Hamas charter itself, published by the terrorists themselves, seems to differ to Claire:

The Hamas Charter (or Covenant) proclaims that Israel will exist until Islam obliterates it, and jihad against Jews is required until Judgement Day. Compromise over the land is forbidden. The documents promote holy war as divinely ordained, reject political solutions, and call for instilling these views in children. The ultimate aim is the destruction of Israel and the murder of all its Jewish citizens.

Article 6.  Hamas is uniquely Palestinian. But remember, Palestinians didn't actually exist in their modern form until Egyptian-born Muslim Brotherhood terrorist Yasser Arafat invented them and their misappropriated Jordanian flag in 1964, and "strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine, for under the wing of Islam followers of all religions can coexist in security and safety where their lives, possessions and rights are concerned".

Article 7. As a result of the fact that those Muslims who adhere to the ways of the Islamic Resistance Movement spread all over the world, rally support for it and its stands, strive towards enhancing its struggle, the Movement is a universal one.

Article 11. The Islamic Resistance Movement believes that the land of Palestine is an Islamic Waqf consecrated for future Moslem generations until Judgement Day. It, or any part of it, should not be squandered: it, or any part of it, should not be given up.

Article 22 Makes sweeping conspiratorial claims about Jewish influence and power. It specifically claims that the Jews were responsible for instigating multiple revolutions and wars, including the French Revolution, World War I, and the Russian Revolution.

Article 28 Conspiracy charges against Israel and the whole of the Jewish people: "Israel, Judaism and Jews". It claims that "Zionist organizations" aim to destroy society through moral corruption and eliminating Islam, and are responsible for drug trafficking and alcoholism.

This below is just mind-blowing pig-ignorance demonstrating a total lack of knowledge about the terrorists of Hamas. "They undeniable call for the annihilation of liberal democracy". Really? Please folks, never lower yourselves to take the drugs she could potentially be taking!

 
And below is another example from her divisive blog. Remember, she claims she is not an antisemite, yet uses an image and blog name to infer it has come from someone Jewish when it in fact the nonsense from a clueless and dangerous Malaysian "with Nazi characteristics"
Contrary to Claire Khaw's outlandish claims, the Hamas charter advocates views that are simply anti-Jewish, xenophobic and outside the mainstream of the scholarly tradition of Islam. Yet here is Claire Khaw, fully supporting and glorifying Hamas through a series of infantile untruths, while at the same time claiming she is "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". 
So here she is, contradicting and disagreeing with herself in plain sight!
Here are some of her gemstone pronouncements on Hamas apropos the atrocity committed in Israel on Sunday 7th October 2023. Even with the most fertile of conspiratorial minds, you really couldn't make these up. Again, to b ore you to death, I remind you that she self-proclaims to be "A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". All the while using here thoroughly divisive and immoral Radicalised Rabbi blog title together with its Jewish image as illustration.

Yes, as it happens, all over your Facebook timeline and your thoroughly disgusting personal blog. One only has to look!

 
An acknowledged self-hater of Israel, so he has no right to talk. And anything connected with Iran - well it speaks volumes!
The lunatics of Naturei Karta (called Unnatural Carthorse by normal Jews) are of course heroes of Claire Khaw's divisiveness

What better than to then repost the wittering of a confirmed antisemitic conspiracy theorist who thinks Russia has a say in Israeli politics (while months into their unlawful invasion of Ukraine, something Claire Khaw has conveniently forgotten to condemn)?
 

As if the Russian views of The Hamas-Israeli conflict, especially from the warped view of a grinning Cheshire cat antisemitic conspiracy theorist actually matter!

And this is one of her loony-tunes supporters whom she is quite happy to allow post on her Facebook timeline. Sunny Boy certainly proves what floats if you don't flush your toilet! He's not exactly a beacon of light for Claire Khaw's religion of peace! What only amuses the simplistic Jihadist, eh?

So rather than be the moralist she dishonestly claims to be, she just appears to spend all her time finding and reposting the most offensive, nonsensical and conspiratorial material she can find there really can be no other explanation that, after 14 years of pushing her secular crap and gaining nothing but a following by lunatic asylum inmates, one could infer she is not firing on all cylinders herself.

That she fails to recognise this information is all from her own postings on her Facebook timeline and extremely offensive and divisive Jewhating blog, well, it says it all as plain as day.

Yes, she's definitely "A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". NOT


Comments

  1. With what words or deeds have I "idolised" Hamas?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Claire Khaw's religion of peace" - I have never claimed to be Muslim. Secular Koranism is a legal system supporting the First Amendment with 2:256 of the Koran.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe

What sort of "thing" at all is this secular koranism nonsense?

DISCLAIMER: I am deeply indebted to the "fully-qualified", "experienced", "professorial adademics" and a "working legal eagle" all of whom, in their professional capacities (apologies, no names for obvious reasons) have given up their time to concur fully with my observances based solely on the facts and evidence (all obtained through Claire Khaw's own postings) that I have gathered. It has not been my intention in any way to do so, but there is nothing libelous or defamatory within this series of exposé blogs. It is all simply fully evidence-based, with reasonable conclusions drawn on what I have observed, to demonstrate the utter, blatant, disingenuousness of secular koranism and its inventor. To paraphrase Thomas Edison   "This is something already in existence, just vapidly repurposed as something else, but as a something else no one needs or wants, that doesn't, and will never, work and is otherwise a creative act of misa