Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label secular koranism

Yes, starting a religion! The saga of ridiculous nonsense continues . . . . . .

To celebrate 15 years pushing the incredible nonsense that is secular koranism to no avail, apart from grabbing the attention of conspiracy theorists and people with mental issues, in typical fashion, without the honesty, integrity and morality of admitting secular koranism has been the abject failure it is that no one is interested in, Claire Khaw had an L. Ron Hubbard moment on 22nd Dec 23. She has seen the signs.  The £, $ and € signs that is. Yes, Claire Khaw thinks that people want her to start a religion; the same Claire Khaw, the agnostic proselytiser for Islam via her secular koranism, has talked herself into thinking people actually want her to start a religion. You can tell by the tone of her postings that it will be yet another total con job.     It is indeed ironic that the "disturbingly" probably does indeed refer to her acolyrtes, most of whom are in fact very disturbed people! And in fairness, that 5 people out of a world population of some 8,045,311,447 (at th

Quotes. Everyone loves a quote. These are incredible.

I have no idea what the above quote makes me think of secular koranism and Claire Khaw. Here are some of the gems from Claire Khaw of secular koranism as well some from her acolytes on her Facebook timeline or her own disgustingly divisive and antisemitic blog. The ones from her acolytes have been, at the time of writing this, on her timeline for months, many of which, if she had the level of morailty she claims , would have otherwise been removed immediately by anyone claiming similar "morality" to Claire Khaw. Admitting her favourite acolyte (Vncent Bruno) has mental problems, yet not vetting his wholly antsemitic, conspiracy theorising quotes, says a lot about Claire Khaw. However, unlike Claire Khaw herself wouldn't like to allow you to do, I'll leave it to you to make up your own mind by reading the gathered evidence and then decide. Some experts completely disagree "I disagree with Claire Khaw. Claire claims to have invented a new version of Shari’a calle

Is secular koranism a cult. Many seem to think so. Including a retired deputy USA District Attourney.

I have just showed this (it was posted inthe Virtual Bnai Noah-Nohide Community but seems to have disappeared now from both - the moderators plainly thought it was as megalomanically iffy as I did - of course given Claire Khaw's total lack of morality, it is still on her timeline at the time of posting this some hours later) to a very old school friend of mine who I have met who I've not seen for years an is a recently retired deputy District Attourney in the USA. He was popping though the UK travelling on elsewhere to see family for Christmas (2023). Without knowing anything about secular koranism or Claire Khaw , he intoned " This is a cult leader, isn't it, and why is she using the image of a Jewish service with rabbis and a rabbi "name" for her page if she's not Jewish herself? Looks like veiled antisemitism to me as a back stop to blame Jews for her outpourings should her fellow Muslims object and need someone to blame ".  I also think that with

To recap and summarise all about secular koranism and how truly nonsensical it all is - this will save you reading all blogs (altough I hope you do)

One does have to question the motives and thought processes of Claire Khaw. She may be clever (devious) , but certinly demonstrates time and time again that she is not very bright and certainly is most definitely lacking any intelligence. Her claims about the CIA controlling the world's media , together with the other conspiracy theories/theorists she supports and defends, and the incredibly idiotic statement that "Hamas only want Jews in Israel to live under Sharia" are particularly good examples. These two alone that she will not back down from, despite being offered solid, empirical proof to the contrary, completely defy any form of belief. This is more so given Clair Khaw is a person claiming to have an honours law degree (as a barrister) from Kingston University . "Yes m'Lud. I offer no proof whatsoever, but I state categorically that my client is innocent. Therefore you must free him". " The Law of Assumption states that if you believe already