Secular koranism was invented by Claire Khaw in 2009. Despite its 15 years in existence, Microsoft's "Copilot", the software giant's newly developed AI companion, was perhaps
not the most flattering when asked about "secular koranism" this week The last in October 2023) ......
or, because of her past associations and activities, about Claire Khaw herself. The AI brought up her BNP past and promptly dispensed with it returning this answer:
Claire Khaw ALWAYS, without fail, uses Wikipedia (unless quoting
one of her miscreant acolyte's personal blogs) as her source to back up
her claims. Bear in mind Wikipedia themselves (rather ironically, I'm using a Wikipedia link myself below,
although in fairness, Wikipedia rightly do not allow these two pages to be
edited by the public!) issue two warning about using them as a
reference, which are reproduced here. I have concluded that this is because there are no other validated, reliable sources available to back up many of her claims.
No, that's not what Wikipedia themselves say Claire! Why not fact check things yourself Claire Khaw! You are the one mkaing the outlandish claims all the time! And if you have to head off somewhere else to check it, as you perhaps suggest, surely it would be simpler and more ethical/moral go to the authoritative source in the first place!
The first two screen grabs here
are as recent as 28 Oct 23, despite having been telling her for a year
or more about the reliability of using Wikipedia as a verifiable and recognised source of proof for a claim, But she will not listen. This is rather strange for someone who claims to be a
legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a
psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world" (see How indeed?)
Some of the claims she has made that she uses Wikipedia to back her up.
Remember, she claims to be
a
legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a
psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgeable person in the West, if not the whole wide world" (see How indeed?) yet relies so heavily on Wikipedia as her source.
This is what the somewhat non-PC but very funny Jeremy Clarkson said about Wikipedia back in 2007. He has, as far as I am aware, never written a single thing that could be considered a conspiracy theory in all his years in journalism.
Comments
Post a Comment