Skip to main content

Would YOU rely almost exclusively on Wikipedia to prove your claims?

Secular koranism was invented by Claire Khaw in 2009. Despite its 15 years in existence, Microsoft's "Copilot", the software giant's newly developed AI companion, was perhaps not the most flattering when asked about "secular koranism" this week The last in October 2023) ......

or, because of her past associations and activities, about Claire Khaw herself. The AI brought up her BNP past and promptly dispensed with it returning this answer:

Claire Khaw ALWAYS, without fail, uses Wikipedia (unless quoting one of her miscreant acolyte's personal blogs) as her source to back up her claims. Bear in mind Wikipedia themselves (rather ironically, I'm using a Wikipedia link myself below, although in fairness, Wikipedia rightly do not allow these two pages to be edited by the public!) issue two warning about using them as a reference, which are reproduced here. I have concluded that this is because there are no other validated, reliable sources available to back up many of her claims.

No, that's not what Wikipedia themselves say Claire! Why not fact check things yourself Claire Khaw! You are the one mkaing the outlandish claims all the time! And if you have to head off somewhere else to check it, as you perhaps suggest, surely it would be simpler and more ethical/moral go to the authoritative source in the first place!
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a reliable source - Wikipedia
 Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia - Wikipedia

 She added this at 12:45 on Sunday morning, 29 Oct 23

The first two screen grabs here are as recent as 28 Oct 23, despite having been telling her for a year or more about the reliability of using Wikipedia as a verifiable and recognised source of proof for a claim, But she will not listen. This is rather strange for someone who claims to be a legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world" (see How indeed?)

 
 Some of the claims she has made that she uses Wikipedia to back her up.






Remember, she claims to be a legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgeable person in the West, if not the whole wide world" (see How indeed?) yet relies so heavily on Wikipedia as her source.
 
This is what the somewhat non-PC but very funny Jeremy Clarkson said about Wikipedia back in 2007. He has, as far as I am aware, never written a single thing that could be considered a conspiracy theory in all his years in journalism.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe...
1 comment
Read more

You can't beat a good conspiracy theory/lie/nonsense when those you support tend to be deranged too

I can only assume Claire Khaw's lack of knowledge about the truth and current affairs is driven by her addiction, 24/7, to Facebook (that is, when she's not trolling the internet for deviants to support her nonsense, or having conversations for her own puerile YouTube videos and blogs).  She is, to paraphrase Rod Liddle from The Sunday Times on 26 Nov 23 [that is, the newspaper first published 202 years ago , at the time of writing this blog, on 18 February 1821 (originally as The New Observer ) and taken over by Rupert Murdoch's News International in 1981, as opposed to Claire Khaw's Sunday Times that is owned by the CIA] an example of a modern, internet-addicted person whose IQ is shrinking. " People's IQ's are declining due to their failure to assimilate knowledge, history and real news by languishing on the internet 24/7 and not paying any attention to real things going on around them. They are becoming more ignorant thought their own endeavours...
Post a Comment
Read more

Koraniyule - yes, you read that right. More Narnian nonsense from Claire Khaw

As if the conflicting, oxymoronic title of Claire Khaw's "secular koranism" cult is not bad enough, she is now misappropriating the end of year predominantly Christian-orientated holiday time with the inventing of "Koraniyule".  Presumably this leads up to Koranisolstice on 22nd December, prior to Koranilent around Easter with Koranikippur and Koranidawali in the Autumn. What the Koran and Yule have to do with rabbis reading from the Jeewish Torah is a mystery and proves the skewered thinking of cultist Claire Khaw Koraniyule exists only in the mind of Claire Khaw, but in fairness, she has managed to talk some of her sheepish devotees (all five of them, one of whom she states has mental issues) into believing that this nonsensical Koraniyule, like Santa Claus, actually exists.  It does not. It is such a shame there is no sanity clause to get rid of all this Narnian secular koranism nonsense! Claire Khaw is the first to call out anyone who looks at her Koran side...
Post a Comment
Read more