Skip to main content

Would YOU rely almost exclusively on Wikipedia to prove your claims?

Secular koranism was invented by Claire Khaw in 2009. Despite its 15 years in existence, Microsoft's "Copilot", the software giant's newly developed AI companion, was perhaps not the most flattering when asked about "secular koranism" this week The last in October 2023) ......

or, because of her past associations and activities, about Claire Khaw herself. The AI brought up her BNP past and promptly dispensed with it returning this answer:

Claire Khaw ALWAYS, without fail, uses Wikipedia (unless quoting one of her miscreant acolyte's personal blogs) as her source to back up her claims. Bear in mind Wikipedia themselves (rather ironically, I'm using a Wikipedia link myself below, although in fairness, Wikipedia rightly do not allow these two pages to be edited by the public!) issue two warning about using them as a reference, which are reproduced here. I have concluded that this is because there are no other validated, reliable sources available to back up many of her claims.

No, that's not what Wikipedia themselves say Claire! Why not fact check things yourself Claire Khaw! You are the one mkaing the outlandish claims all the time! And if you have to head off somewhere else to check it, as you perhaps suggest, surely it would be simpler and more ethical/moral go to the authoritative source in the first place!

The first two screen grabs here are as recent as 28 Oct 23, despite having been telling her for a year or more about the reliability of using Wikipedia as a verifiable and recognised source of proof for a claim, But she will not listen. This is rather strange for someone who claims to be a legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world" (see How indeed?)

 Some of the claims she has made that she uses Wikipedia to back her up.






Remember, she claims to be a legally-qualified (honours degree non-practising barrister) moralist, a psychologist, a scientist, a philosopher and a political campaigner, all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgeable person in the West, if not the whole wide world" (see How indeed?) yet relies so heavily on Wikipedia as her source.
 
This is what the somewhat non-PC but very funny Jeremy Clarkson said about Wikipedia back in 2007. He has, as far as I am aware, never written a single thing that could be considered a conspiracy theory in all his years in journalism.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New street-gutter low reached by the inventor of the "secular koranism" cult

I'd like you to hold the underlined statements in the image below in your mind for a few paragraphs. It's the introduction to one of the most dystopian pseudo religious books on Amazon, described by a leading independent Islamic scholar in essence as being " just over 100 pages of inaccurate, pure drivel, in a larger than necessary font, that does nothing if demonstrate the writer's total lack of understanding of Islam and the Quran ". The full excellently researched white paper can be found here . I'd like to state from the outset that some people have said I am being somewhat harsh on Claire Khaw throughout these exposé blogs. Well I can assure you that everything contained within these blogs refuting secular koranism, while I have added commentary of my own, is 100% evidence-based on Claire Khaw's very own output on social media and elsewhere.  Yes, I have indeed been harsh, because the evidence points clearly to Claire Khaw being an inveterate lia...

Claire Khaw - unhindered by any form of, or the requirement for, credibility, morality and honesty - "The Khaw Effect"

I bought one of these some years ago. In it on the wall in my man cave, and every time I read the rubbish Claire Khaw posts, especially from the antisemitic USA chief of conspiracy theories, Paul Craig Roberts, (More about how he fits in with Claire Khaw's infantile secular koranism Sharia "legal system" later) I give a brief acknowledgement salute towards it. The red and yellow segments below are essentially Claire Khaw's sole points of reference. Claire Khaw is very unique, in more ways than one. She is the sort of person whom, if you were in her company and she said, "Oh it's night time", you would have to look at your own watch as well as walk outside to check it was dark. Are you familiar with the Sky TV documentary programme "Border Security"? It chronicles the protective measures Australia's Border Force, Immigration and Customs professional take to protect the continental and rather large island of Australia from the importation of...

Comparing the inventor of secular koranism to the Horizon Post Office scandal

The inventor of the secular koranism cult, Claire Khaw, and the Fujitsu Horizon Post Office scandal have so much in common! 1. Clueless, if not immoral legal people from the Post Office saying all was all fine and dandy when it most certainly was not. Claire Khaw claims to be an honours law graduate. 2. Apportioning blame to everyone else except themselves (the trait of a cult). 3. Those postmasters who were blamed, lost their lives or were jailed, had to pay back money they did not owe, were vilified by their communities, lost their businesses, their livelihoods and their homes were all ignored despite proof being in their favour that Horizon was not fit for purpose and that the sub-postmasters were all in fact 100% innocent. It is very simple to prove Claire Khaw wrong, almost excl;usively though her own postings, yet she will NEVER admit, take responsibility or apologise she is/was wrong. 4. The Post Office made sh*t up as they want along in an attempt to obfuscate the truth about H...