Skip to main content

SECULAR is "religion free". The KORAN "is a bible and is RELIGIOUS". So is Claire Khaw all there with her lemon drops?

It has become more blindingly obvious from her recent posts on social media and her vile blogs, that Claire Khaw seems to have lost the plot totally.She definitely has some form of mental problem.

To quote journalist and commentator Rod Liddle:

"People who sign up to conspiracy theories because of the idiocies which chime with their own monomaniacal warped view of the world."

The above is Claire Khaw and her brainwashed friend Green Day (the American Idiot) down to a tee.

She continually claims to be an agnostic, yet is so obviously proselytising for Sharia (Taliban/Hamas style) Islam with her utterly farcical and dystopian "secular koranism". With zero qualifications, she is now laughingly (actually, dangerously) offering "marriageability classes". And we all know about the marriage antics of her prophet (and current god, despite her so-called agnosticism), don't we? More wives than you or I have had hot dinners! And some pecuniary habits too, which it is hoped she is not encouraging in her 100% unqualified "marriageability classes".

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/47072/wives-of-prophet-muhammad .“The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.” Narrated by al-Bukhari, 3894; Muslim, 1422.Yes indeed!

Without exception, all my Muslim friends think she is stark-raving bonkers, doing absolutely nothing but harming Islam and generating Islamophobia, which given her membership of the BNP some years ago, could point to a thoroughly nasty hidden agenda. 

Allow me to revisit some establishes definitions that even a professional conspiracy theorist like Claire Khaw cannot refute:

And then she claims this herself. "Secular koranism is Islam light", i.e. it's religion based. So she is actually disagreeing with herself.

My Muslim friends find it repulsive that she, with zero theological training or experience, declares them not to be real Muslims by virtue of them living in the West. At least all the Muslims I know work hard for a living, contribute to society, and were brought up as respectable British (apart from those I know who live abroad) family people,  and correctly versed in Islam for the right reasons, which is a London marathon more than can be said for Claire Khaw (she does not work, and instead, scrounges from DWP), who has been derided by a top Islamic scholar for her lack of any understanding of Islam or the Koran.

 






Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why does Claire Khaw idolise the terrorists Hamas with her sheer fiction and yet has NEVER condemned them?

Before starting this, I remind you that Claire Khaw professes to be, " A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgeable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". All the evidence presented below is either from her own timeline/offensive antisemitic blog, or from freely available authoritative (unlike Claire Khaw who only uses Wikipedia) sources. It is worth noting the words  legally-qualified moralist above in the context that since the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7th October (it is now 28 Nov - 7 WEEKS since) NOT ONCE has Claire Khaw called out the atrocity, admitted that Hamas are terrorists or offered/shown the slightest sympathy for the 1,400 Israeli brutally murdered, or acknowledge that the Hamas Charter, which is accessible everywhere on the Internet, is acknowledged worldwide as calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. And she had the bare-faced nerve to post this
4 comments
Read more

What sort of "thing" at all is this secular koranism nonsense?

DISCLAIMER: I am deeply indebted to the "fully-qualified", "experienced", "professorial academics" and a "working legal eagle" all of whom, in their professional capacities (apologies, no names for obvious reasons) have given up their time to concur fully with my observances based solely on the facts and evidence (all obtained through Claire Khaw's own postings) that I have gathered. It has not been my intention in any way to do so, but there is nothing libelous or defamatory within this series of exposé blogs. It is all simply fully evidence-based, with reasonable conclusions drawn on what I have observed, to demonstrate the utter, blatant, disingenuousness of secular koranism and its inventor. To paraphrase Thomas Edison   "This is something already in existence, just vapidly repurposed as something else, but as a something else no one needs or wants, that doesn't, and will never, work and is otherwise a creative act of misa
1 comment
Read more

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe
1 comment
Read more