Skip to main content

SECULAR is "religion free". The KORAN "is a bible and is RELIGIOUS". So is Claire Khaw all there with her lemon drops?

It has become more blindingly obvious from her recent posts on social media and her vile blogs, that Claire Khaw seems to have lost the plot totally.She definitely has some form of mental problem.

To quote journalist and commentator Rod Liddle:

"People who sign up to conspiracy theories because of the idiocies which chime with their own monomaniacal warped view of the world."

The above is Claire Khaw and her brainwashed friend Green Day (the American Idiot) down to a tee.

She continually claims to be an agnostic, yet is so obviously proselytising for Sharia (Taliban/Hamas style) Islam with her utterly farcical and dystopian "secular koranism". With zero qualifications, she is now laughingly (actually, dangerously) offering "marriageability classes". And we all know about the marriage antics of her prophet (and current god, despite her so-called agnosticism), don't we? More wives than you or I have had hot dinners! And some pecuniary habits too, which it is hoped she is not encouraging in her 100% unqualified "marriageability classes".

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/47072/wives-of-prophet-muhammad .“The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) married me when I was six years old, and consummated the marriage with me when I was nine.” Narrated by al-Bukhari, 3894; Muslim, 1422.Yes indeed!

Without exception, all my Muslim friends think she is stark-raving bonkers, doing absolutely nothing but harming Islam and generating Islamophobia, which given her membership of the BNP some years ago, could point to a thoroughly nasty hidden agenda. 

Allow me to revisit some establishes definitions that even a professional conspiracy theorist like Claire Khaw cannot refute:

And then she claims this herself. "Secular koranism is Islam light", i.e. it's religion based. So she is actually disagreeing with herself.

My Muslim friends find it repulsive that she, with zero theological training or experience, declares them not to be real Muslims by virtue of them living in the West. At least all the Muslims I know work hard for a living, contribute to society, and were brought up as respectable British (apart from those I know who live abroad) family people,  and correctly versed in Islam for the right reasons, which is a London marathon more than can be said for Claire Khaw (she does not work, and instead, scrounges from DWP), who has been derided by a top Islamic scholar for her lack of any understanding of Islam or the Koran.

 






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been  terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe...

To recap and summarise all about secular koranism and how truly nonsensical it all is - this will save you reading all blogs (altough I hope you do)

One does have to question the motives and thought processes of Claire Khaw. She may be clever (devious) , but certinly demonstrates time and time again that she is not very bright and certainly is most definitely lacking any intelligence. Her claims about the CIA controlling the world's media , together with the other conspiracy theories/theorists she supports and defends, and the incredibly idiotic statement that "Hamas only want Jews in Israel to live under Sharia" are particularly good examples. These two alone that she will not back down from, despite being offered solid, empirical proof to the contrary, completely defy any form of belief. This is more so given Clair Khaw is a person claiming to have an honours law degree (as a barrister) from Kingston University . "Yes m'Lud. I offer no proof whatsoever, but I state categorically that my client is innocent. Therefore you must free him". " The Law of Assumption states that if you believe already...

"I am not antisemitic, who of my friends are antisemites/Jewhaters? You can't be jailed for being antisemitic!"

Yes, she is not antsemitic, yet sees nothing wrong with posting this on 21 December '23, giving publicity to the piece of dog excrement that is the highly-jailable neo-Nazi Nick Griffin. What normal person claiming not to be antisemitic even pays the slightest attention to this vile human being? She should be dismissing him, not publicising him. And she does this all the time, having the absolute bare-faced cheek to ask this yet again (having asked it many times before and been offered proof on every occasion) on 27 Dec '23 Claire Khaw is out on her own here. As she says herself below: "I don't think" . And that is the basic problem. Claire Khaw tends not to think, apart from the odd thought or 30 that she is always right and everyone else is wrong. She will never admit to being wrong or that there are people out there who are far better and far more qualified than she is as the expert she dishonestly claims to be. She doesn't care about the feelings of othe...