Koraniyule - yes, you read that right. More Narnian nonsense from Claire Khaw

As if the conflicting, oxymoronic title of Claire Khaw's "secular koranism" cult is not bad enough, she is now misappropriating the end of year predominantly Christian-orientated holiday time with the inventing of "Koraniyule".

Presumably this leads up to Koranisolstice on 22nd December, prior to Koranilent around Easter with Koranikippur and Koranidawali in the Autumn.

What the Koran and Yule have to do with rabbis reading from the Jeewish Torah is a mystery and proves the skewered thinking of cultist Claire Khaw

Koraniyule exists only in the mind of Claire Khaw, but in fairness, she has managed to talk some of her sheepish devotees (all five of them, one of whom she states has mental issues) into believing that this nonsensical Koraniyule, like Santa Claus, actually exists.

It does not.

It is such a shame there is no sanity clause to get rid of all this Narnian secular koranism nonsense!

Claire Khaw is the first to call out anyone who looks at her Koran sideways or accuses those as Islamophobes who dare to suggest that Hamas, the Taliban or ISIS are Islamist terrorists. Yet she is extremely and quite nastily Christianophobic and somewhat antisemitic herself.

And therefore, she is one huge hypocrite.

That she choses to misapprporiate "Yule" as having any form of tenuous connection with Islam, typifies the hypocrisy of Claire Khaw. "Yule" has Nordic and Scandinavian origins with a dose of the Germanic winter festival historically observed and incorporated into Christmas at the time when Germany was becoming Christian. You can't get any more far removed from Islam than northern Europe of centuries ago.

But here we have Claire Khaw misappropriating the rather pagan end of the Christian festival of Christma while denouncing Christiains and Christianity idolitors who "worship a dead Jew on a stick". And she claims to be "a moralist and possibly the most learned theologian on the planet".

You might be forgiven for thinking she is stark-raving, bat-sh!t bonkers.

Ironically, despite Claire Khaw's protestations that her cult is "secular", it is decidedly a proseletyising vehicle for Claire Khaw's skewed version of Sharia, something many Muslims actually find highly offensive (she dismisses them as not being "real Muslims"). The problem is that she lacks any real knowledge or understanding of Islam herself.

This has been pointed out to her again and again by many experts on Islam, but Claire Khaw does not accept that these highy-educated and qualified people, many of whom are religious teachers, have anywhere near to her level of theological knowledge and expertise, which is otherwise quite correrct, as her knowledge is zero.

Or even less than.

Comments

Why does Claire Khaw idolise the terrorists Hamas with her sheer fiction and yet has NEVER condemned them?

Before starting this, I remind you that Claire Khaw professes to be, " A psychologist, a legally-qualified moralist, a scientist, a philosopher and the most theologically knowledgeable person in the West if not in the whole wide world". All the evidence presented below is either from her own timeline/offensive antisemitic blog, or from freely available authoritative (unlike Claire Khaw who only uses Wikipedia) sources. It is worth noting the words legally-qualified moralist above in the context that since the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7th October (it is now 28 Nov - 7 WEEKS since) NOT ONCE has Claire Khaw called out the atrocity, admitted that Hamas are terrorists or offered/shown the slightest sympathy for the 1,400 Israeli brutally murdered, or acknowledge that the Hamas Charter, which is accessible everywhere on the Internet, is acknowledged worldwide as calling for the destruction of Israel and the murder of Jews. And she had the bare-faced nerve to post this

What sort of "thing" at all is this secular koranism nonsense?

DISCLAIMER: I am deeply indebted to the "fully-qualified", "experienced", "professorial academics" and a "working legal eagle" all of whom, in their professional capacities (apologies, no names for obvious reasons) have given up their time to concur fully with my observances based solely on the facts and evidence (all obtained through Claire Khaw's own postings) that I have gathered. It has not been my intention in any way to do so, but there is nothing libelous or defamatory within this series of exposé blogs. It is all simply fully evidence-based, with reasonable conclusions drawn on what I have observed, to demonstrate the utter, blatant, disingenuousness of secular koranism and its inventor. To paraphrase Thomas Edison "This is something already in existence, just vapidly repurposed as something else, but as a something else no one needs or wants, that doesn't, and will never, work and is otherwise a creative act of misa

What sort of a chap is her buddy boy Vincent Bruno?

Let's start with potentially one of the most offensive reposts on Facebook during 2023. No contra argument from Claire Khaw, bearing in mind she is quick to remind everyone that she is a legally-qualified moralist, psychologist, scientist, philosopher and political campaigne r , all on top of being "the most theologically knowledgable person in the West, if not the whole wide world. Would you post this abhorrence on your timeline, irrespective of your delusional claims made above? This is not the behaviour of a normal, sentient and caring human being. It is deeply inhumane, Hitlerian and antisocial. But Claire Khaw simply cannot herself see how deeply offensive and immoral it is. So what he is saying, and to which Claire Khaw concurs, is that these wonderful kids should have been terminated before age 11. I find that so incredibly barbaric and would like to think of it as a justifiable jailable offence. I had a second-cousin who was severly mentally handicapped and who passe

Radicalised Imam

Search This Blog